Posted On: July 3, 2006 by John Randy Sawyer

Judge Rules EIFS is Defective, Awards $2.5 Million to Plaintiff

Norfolk Circuit Court Judge Joseph A. Leafe has ruled that Dryvit's Outsulation is defective and awarded Plaintiffs $2.5 Million in Board of Directors of the Bay Point Condominium Association Inc., et al v. RML Corp., et al At Law No. L99-475

He concludes:

" it is obvious to this Court that the pervasive water damage in residential structures clad with Outsulation is primarily due to the defective design of the Outsulation system and the lack of details. Dryvit failed to perform field trials, mock-up testing, or any hands on evaluation that tested the entire Outsulation system or Outsulations' interaction with other materials required to form the complete residential housing envelope... Moreover, Dryvit Employee, I. J. Valainis' testimony reveals that Dryvit never did any tests to evaluate Dryvit's compatibility with other building components, like windows and doors. From the evidence presented, it is clear to this Court that Dryvit's Outsulation EIFS system was defective when purchased by RML.

While the Court finds that the installation complied with the general standards in the trade, even if the Outsulation were perfectly applied according to Dryvit's specifications, instructions, and details, the patented Outsulation "system" consisting of the method of application and the component parts, is intrinsically defective and thus, is not merchantable ... The representations made by Defendants in relation to the Outsulation product cannot, under any circumstances, be fulfilled. Outsulation is far from maintenance-free and is not suitable for use on wood framed residential construction."

The rest of the opinion is similarly scathing in its criticism of Dry-Vit's barrier EIFS product. If you want more details, please contact us.

Posted by John Randy Sawyer | | Email This Post

Posted In: EIFS

Bookmark:      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at del.icio.us      Digg Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at Digg.com      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at Spurl.net      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at Simpy.com      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at NewsVine      Blink this Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at blinklist.com      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at Furl.net      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at reddit.com      Fark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at Fark.com      Bookmark Judge%20Rules%20EIFS%20is%20Defective%2C%20Awards%20%242.5%20Million%20to%20Plaintiff at Yahoo! MyWeb

Recent Updates

  • March 31, 2008 8:04 AM
    Homeowner's Association Standing To Assert Without Joining the HomeownersDonald B. Brenner, Shareholder and Chair of Stark & Stark's Construction Litigation group has authored the article Homeowner's Association Standing To Assert Without Joining the Homeowners for the March 24, 2008 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal.
  • March 25, 2008 4:03 PM
    $5 Million Verdict In Favor Of New Jersey Residential High-Rise BuildingOn March 11, 2008, in the matter of Camelot Condominium Association, Inc v. Dryvit Systems, Inc., pending before the Superior Court of New jersey, Docket No. BER-L-012457-04, a jury entered a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff and against Dryvit...
  • March 4, 2008 3:29 PM
    Condo Association Equitably Estopped from Consumer Fraud Act Relief When Its Conduct Resulted in the ViolationAfter a condominium association president declined a contractor’s request to execute a written change order and directed the contractor to proceed with the additional work, the association was barred from seeking relief under the Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”) (N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -167) provisions requiring that all modifications to contracts for home improvements be in writing. B & H Securities, Inc., v. CKC Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 2008 WL 508082 (App. Div., February 27, 2008).
  • December 12, 2007 8:32 AM
    Property Owner Did Not Waive Arbitration Clause by Participating in LawsuitIn an unpublished case, the Appellate Division recently affirmed the trial court’s decision that defendant property owner did not waive the arbitration clause of its AIA construction contract with plaintiff construction company by participating in plaintiff lawsuit for a year before invoking the arbitration clause.
  • November 30, 2007 8:31 AM
    Consumers Cannot Waive Regulatory Requirement for Written Home Improvement ContractsThe Appellate Division recently denied a landscaping contractor’s suit to collect amounts due for extra work in addition to that called for in his contract for complete landscaping of the defendants’ home. Online Contracting, Inc. v. Tripucka, No. A-2622-06 (App....
  • November 13, 2007 11:01 AM
    Gehry - Construction Defects are InevitableWorld famous architect Frank Gehry, and his firm Gehry Partners is a defendant in a recent lawsuit brought by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology alleging design and construction defects in a $300 Million building on the Cambridge, Massachusetts campus.
  • October 23, 2007 2:40 PM
    Builder's Risk Policy Does Not Cover Damage to City Sewer PipePlaintiff WHP9, the developer of a multi-building residential project in North Bergen, secured a builder’s risk policy from defendant Centennial Insurance and liability insurance from another carrier before beginning construction.
  • October 8, 2007 8:08 AM
    Appellate Division Enforces Terms of Association’s Insurance PolicyIn an unpublished decision, the Appellate Division recently enforced an insurer’s duty to indemnify and defend a condominium association for damages resulting from an occurrence during the policy period even though they were not discovered until after the policy had expired. Steinbauer v. East Coast Acquisitions, LLC, 2007 WL 2593007 (App. Div. September 11, 2007).
  • October 1, 2007 8:14 AM
    New Jersey Federal Court Declines to Hear Minnesota Insurance Coverage Dispute.Judge Noel L. Hillman of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting in Trenton, recently dismissed a case before her on the grounds that the New Jersey court was an inappropriate place to hear the dispute.
  • September 26, 2007 8:10 AM
    District Court Defines "Residential Construction"As we conduct discovery in our most egregious construction defect cases, construction litigators often observe that the same financial shortfalls that lead overextended or greedy developers to “cut corners” or “cheap the job” often result in their leaving contractors, subcontractors and suppliers unpaid when their contracts are “complete.”

Stark & Stark Web Sites